H.R. 4: Rescissions Act of 2025

Theodore Wu

31 Aug 2025 — 1 min read

Context

In budget language, a rescission means the cancellation of funding that Congress already approved but that hasn’t yet been spent (or “obligated”). The Rescissions Act of 2025 cancels about $9.4 billion in these unspent funds. Most of the cuts come from international aid programs managed by the State Department and USAID, along with funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (which supports outlets like NPR and PBS).

The law was introduced under the Impoundment Control Act, which allows the president to propose rescissions and requires Congress to decide whether to approve them. By passing this law, Congress agreed to the president’s request, formally pulling back the funds. The intent is to reclaim unused budget authority and prevent those dollars from being used in the future.

Key Provisions

Cancels $9.4 Billion in Unspent Funds. ~$7.9 billion from international assistance accounts. ~$1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Targets Unobligated Balances. Funds were appropriated but had not yet been committed to contracts or programs.
Uses Expedited Process. The law employed the special rescissions process under the Impoundment Control Act, which moves faster than regular appropriations and avoids a Senate filibuster.

Arguments For

Fiscal Discipline. Prevents unspent funds from being used later, showing restraint on government spending.
Efficiency. Closes out unused appropriations without waiting for a future budget cycle.
Congressional Oversight. Converts the president’s proposal into law, ensuring that the decision to cut funding remains legislative, not executive-only.

Arguments Against

Cuts Active Priorities. Rescissions touch funding for global health, democracy promotion, refugee aid, and broadcasting services, which still had policy importance.
Impacts Public Media. The loss of Corporation for Public Broadcasting funds could affect NPR and PBS operations.
Executive Precedent. Although Congress must approve rescissions, the process begins with the president’s proposal, raising questions about shifting budget power toward the White House.

Final Thought

The Rescissions Act of 2025 reclaims billions in unspent federal funds, especially in foreign aid and public broadcasting. Supporters argue it’s common-sense fiscal discipline and an efficient use of congressional authority, while critics caution it strips resources from important programs and sets a precedent for executive-led budget rollbacks.

S. 146: TAKE IT DOWN Act

Context The spread of non-consensual intimate images—often called “revenge porn”—has become one of the most damaging and under-policed harms of the digital age. These images are frequently posted online without permission, sometimes by ex-partners, sometimes by hackers, and sometimes by strangers using stolen content. Once uploaded, they can

H.R. 517: The Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act

Context When natural disasters strike—wildfires, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes—the damage isn’t limited to homes and infrastructure. Families and small businesses often lose critical documents, face interrupted income, and struggle to meet deadlines for tax filings and payments. The IRS has authority to grant extensions, but that relief is

H.R. 1968: Full-Year Continuing Appropriations & Extensions Act

Context Every year, Congress is required to pass 12 appropriations bills that fund federal agencies—from defense and transportation to food safety inspectors and national parks. When lawmakers can’t agree by the start of the fiscal year on October 1, the government runs out of legal authority to spend

H.R.27: HALT Fentanyl Act

Context Fentanyl has become the deadliest driver of America’s overdose crisis. Originally developed as a powerful painkiller, illicit versions—often mixed into heroin, cocaine, or fake prescription pills—are cheap to produce and potent enough that just a few milligrams can be fatal. In recent years, fentanyl-related overdoses have