H.R. 29: Lakan Riley Act

Theodore Wu

25 Aug 2025 — 1 min read

Context

In 2024, the murder of 22-year-old nursing student Laken Riley shocked Georgia and the nation. The man charged with her death was a noncitizen who had been arrested before but released under immigration supervision. For many lawmakers, her death symbolized a gap in enforcement—noncitizens accused of crimes were being released instead of detained. This bill responded directly to that case. By broadening detention rules and giving states the power to sue DHS for non-enforcement, Congress sought to tighten the system and prevent similar tragedies.

Arguments For

Closes Enforcement Gaps. By mandating detention for certain crimes, the law reduces the chance that individuals are released into communities while awaiting proceedings.
Protects Public Safety. Detention for those charged with offenses like assault or causing serious injury reduces perceived risks.
Potential Deterrent. Expanded custody rules may discourage unlawful entry if the consequences are clearer.
Adds Oversight. States are given a direct role in holding DHS accountable, creating another enforcement check.

Arguments Against

Covers Minor Offenses. Crimes such as shoplifting are included, potentially leading to detention of people who pose little broader threat.
Detention Before Conviction. The law requires custody even if someone is only charged, raising due process concerns.
Increases Litigation. Allowing states to sue DHS could result in frequent legal battles over enforcement.
Resource Strain. The expanded detention requirements are not paired with added funding for detention space or processing capacity.

Final Thought

The Laken Riley Act broadens the scope of mandatory detention in U.S. immigration law and gives states leverage to enforce compliance. Supporters frame it as a public safety measure that could deter future crimes; critics warn it may overreach by mandating detention for relatively minor offenses and straining resources. Naming the act after Laken Riley underscores its political and emotional weight, tying a real-world tragedy to a significant policy shift.

S. 146: TAKE IT DOWN Act

Context The spread of non-consensual intimate images—often called “revenge porn”—has become one of the most damaging and under-policed harms of the digital age. These images are frequently posted online without permission, sometimes by ex-partners, sometimes by hackers, and sometimes by strangers using stolen content. Once uploaded, they can

H.R. 517: The Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act

Context When natural disasters strike—wildfires, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes—the damage isn’t limited to homes and infrastructure. Families and small businesses often lose critical documents, face interrupted income, and struggle to meet deadlines for tax filings and payments. The IRS has authority to grant extensions, but that relief is

H.R. 1968: Full-Year Continuing Appropriations & Extensions Act

Context Every year, Congress is required to pass 12 appropriations bills that fund federal agencies—from defense and transportation to food safety inspectors and national parks. When lawmakers can’t agree by the start of the fiscal year on October 1, the government runs out of legal authority to spend

H.R.27: HALT Fentanyl Act

Context Fentanyl has become the deadliest driver of America’s overdose crisis. Originally developed as a powerful painkiller, illicit versions—often mixed into heroin, cocaine, or fake prescription pills—are cheap to produce and potent enough that just a few milligrams can be fatal. In recent years, fentanyl-related overdoses have